Homosociality – Because Men Can Be Besties, Too

I’m on a lit kick lately, so you’ll have to roll with me here.

My junior year of college, I took an absolutely fantastic Victorian Lit class. I made some amazing friends and one ridiculously fabulous Dorian Gray video (there was singing). One of the subjects we studied was male homosociality – that is, the relationships that existed between men and how they are in comparison to the eras both before and after Victorian times.

Homosociality is a great love of mine — particularly with men — because true male friendships are really interesting, and the way men were/are expected to act in society is, as a whole, a multi-layered concept.

What has been really getting to me as of late is this idea in sub-pop culture (of which I am an avid fan) that no two close men in a given television or book series are really just friends. There’s a strange need to write fan fiction and create gif sets and just generally go on about an imagined relationship between these two men that is more than just friendship.

WTF, internet?

It’s not that it bothers me on any sort of homophobic level – I’m a strong ally, marcher in parades, and loud advocate for equality. It bothers me because there are so very few examples of quality male friendship in our culture right now, and it’s like that just isn’t good enough. Homosocial friendships have great and wonderful value. Two men can be incredibly close and not be gay. I do not understand why this is a difficult concept to grasp, or why it is one that must be constantly challenged. Instead of embracing it, the cultural move seems to be instead to transform it into something romantic, which really only serves to further show men “No, you can’t have close friendships. If you do people will think you’re gay. Two men cannot be that close.”

Take Holmes and Watson for example. They have pretty much the best friendship imaginable, and it’s a really beautiful relationship. They do not have to be in love with each other to make it a good story. They do not have to be fighting tumultuous forbidden feelings for us to appreciate how deeply they care for one another. ¬†Honestly, sometimes friendships are a hell of a lot more interesting than romantic relationships.

The bottom line is simply that friendship does not always have to be something ‘more’. Generally, writers have a reason for writing characters and relationships the way they do, and those relationships should be appreciated for the beautiful, complicated things they are.

Because men can be besties, too.


3 thoughts on “Homosociality – Because Men Can Be Besties, Too

  1. Not to mention the fact that automatically shipping two close male friends as a homosexual couple is detrimental to male friendships as a whole. Many men probably avoid close male friendships because they fear being considered homosexual. This, in itself, is wrong. It shouldn’t matter what your sexual orientation is and it shouldn’t matter who you choose to be friends with, but the fact remains that by making every close male friendship automatically homosexual, you are keeping men from forming these kinds of friendships, either for fear of being tormented or because they are homophobic themselves. I say, great for those male friendship who are strong and confident enough not to care (Turk & JD from Scrubs come to mind), but it still seems unfair to the straight men who just want to be besties without everyone making butt sex jokes all the time. Interestingly enough, this is a double standard where women actually come out on top.

  2. Yay, Victorian Lit shout-out! Another awesome example (the penultimate in my opinion) is Cory and Shawn. And if you’re looking for a super awesome read of guy besties, then I strongly suggest The Raven Cycle series by Maggie Stiefvater.

  3. I found this article randomly and thought I should express my agreement. I AM a gay man, but most of my friends are straight men precisely because I’m able to respect this balance. It’s funny, because I remember teaching a Victorian Literature book to my class and having to painstakingly explain to my class that just because two male characters are close, rely on each other, care about each others’ well being, and may even cry if they believe their friend is dead does not mean they want to jump into bed. Things have apparently shifted to the point that this is a required distinction.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s